In my two published novels, Compulsion and Dead Game, my protagonist is a woman who has made the decision to get involved when she knows a crime is being committed. Emily Stone uses her intelligence, her intuition, and a few helpful pieces of technology to track the most dangerous predators in our society. She does all of this work anonymously, leaving a package of evidence for the local police department before moving onto her next case.
What about people who make the decision NOT to get involved? We have all read or heard about instances in which horrifying crimes were taking place and bystanders did nothing to stop the violence. There is the recent incident in which a teenage girl was gang raped for more than two hours outside of her high school homecoming dance in Oakland, California. More than two dozen people witnessed the attacks and did not bother to call the police. The media reports were everywhere—what is wrong with our young people today that they can be so callous and apathetic when a heinous crime is being committed in front of their very eyes?
The decision to not get involved when you see a crime taking place is known as the bystander effect. It is a term developed within the field of social psychology and it refers to the hesitancy of a person to take action during an emergency situation when other people are present. Sometimes, we make the assumption that another person will help. In other instances, the bystander effect can occur because we are waiting to see how other observers react and, as a result, no one acts at all.
What do you think?
Do you know that you would act if you saw someone was being violently attacked?
Are there circumstances in which you would hesitate?
Please share your thoughts.











